🔗 Share this article

Do your LinkedIn connections viewing you as a industry expert? Do numerous respondents applauding your insights on expanding your venture? Do recruiters making contact to discuss collaborations?

Should that not be the case, the explanation could be that you're not male.

The Test: Changing Gender Identity for Better Visibility

Dozens of female professionals joined a collective professional network test this week after viral posts suggested that switching their gender to "man" boosted their platform visibility.

Other testers modified their profiles to include what they termed "masculine-oriented" terminology - inserting results-driven professional jargon like "propel", "revolutionize" and "expedite". Anecdotally, their visibility similarly increased.

Systemic Preference Questions Raised

The improved metrics has caused some to wonder whether a built-in gender bias in the platform's system favors male users who use online business jargon.

Like most major social media platforms, LinkedIn employs a computerized system to determine which content are shown to which users - boosting some while suppressing others.

Platform Response

In a recent blog post, LinkedIn acknowledged the trend but claimed it does not consider "demographic information" when deciding content distribution. Instead, the company explained that "hundreds of signals" influence how content perform.

Modifying profile gender in your settings does not influence how your posts appears in search or feed.

Personal Experiences

Simone Bonnett, who changed her gender identifiers to "he/him" and her name to "Simon E", reported remarkable outcomes.

"The numbers I'm seeing show a 1,600% increase in visitor traffic and a thirteen-fold jump in content views," she noted.

Another professional, a marketing expert, began experimenting after noticing her reach decline significantly.

The Method

• First, she changed her profile gender to "man"
• Then, she used artificial intelligence to rephrase her profile using "male-coded" wording
• Finally, she recycled old posts with comparable "assertive" language

The result was immediate: a 415% increase in reach within one week.

The Downside

Despite the success, Cornish voiced dissatisfaction with the approach.

"Before, my posts were softer - brief and clever, but also friendly and relatable," she stated. "Currently, the bro-coded version was assertive and confident - like a white male being overly confident."

She discontinued the experiment after seven days, stating "Each day I persisted, and results improved, I became more frustrated."

Mixed Results

Some testers encountered favorable outcomes. Cass Cooper who modified both her gender to "man" and her ethnicity to "Caucasian" reported a decrease in visibility and interaction.

"We know there's systemic preference, but it's very challenging to understand how it functions in particular situations or the reasons behind it," she remarked.

Wider Consequences

These tests occur alongside continuing discussions about LinkedIn's unique position as both a business platform and community site.

Recent changes in the past few months have apparently caused women professionals experiencing markedly lower exposure, resulting in informal experiments where identical content by male and female users received dramatically unequal audience engagement.

System Details

According to LinkedIn, the platform uses artificial intelligence to categorize and spread content based on multiple factors, including post content and the user's professional identity.

The company states it regularly evaluates its algorithms, including "checks for gender-related disparities."

A spokesperson proposed that recent declines in some users' reach might stem from increased competition due to additional posts on the network.

Evolving Environment

As one participant noted, "masculine-oriented language" appears to be growing on the platform.

"Users typically consider LinkedIn as more businesslike and refined," she commented. "That's changing. It's turning into increasingly aggressive and unpredictable."