Dining Across the Divide: Perspectives on Immigration and Culture
Introducing the Participants
Stephen, 64, Canvey Island
Profession: Former insurance professional
Voting record: Usually Tory, except when he resided in “the socialist republic of south Hackney” and voted for the SDP
Amuse bouche: His focus in underwriting was kidnap and ransom: People often claim that insurance is dull, but it’s not when you’re planning evacuating people from South Korea because the North Koreans have activated the missile silos”
Eva, twenty-five, the capital
Occupation: Psychology graduate
Political history: In her native land, New Zealand, she supported both Labour and Green
Amuse bouche: Eva has worked as a singer on cruise ships; her longest trip was half a year, which is a long time to be on a boat
Initial impressions
She: Steve appeared there to have a nice time, to be receptive
He: She came across as a very bright, articulate, nice person
She: I had a caprese salad, pasta with fungi, and a rich sweet treat, it was very good
Key disagreement
She: He was certainly on the side of immigration being curtailed. He thinks that British people who are native to the area, including non-white white British, face limited access to the things that they need, because more and more people are arriving. Whereas I just don’t think the figures are that bad
Steve: I’m for qualified migrants, I have no desire to reside in a white, Anglo-Saxon, Protestant country with warm beer. But I maintain that governments have used immigration to fill the jobs they can’t get people to do without raising wages. Wages are suppressed, so levies have to be kept low, so we are unable to improve services – allocate additional funds on child support, on education, on technology
She: I don’t have that much knowledge of the EU referendum, because I was 16 and abroad when it occurred. He clarified it to me in a different perspective. He informed me about EU labor migrants – people could arrive in the UK and receive solely the wage of the country they came from
Steve: The French president spent two years getting the EU to do away with the scheme; it was revised in 2018. Before that, posted workers coming in were undercutting British workers. Under the former PM, it was oil workers that were brought in; later it’s been service industry, farms. She grasped that, because she’d worked on a passenger vessel and said she was paid a lot more than workers from other countries
Common ground
Steve: It would be ideal to have a different energy source, come off of oil. I disapprove of environmental harm, I love the clean air, I appreciate rural areas. We agreed on a lot of that. But I said, “What do you think of the Scandinavian nation?” Their energy revenues soared after Ukraine started, they allocated those funds to develop green infrastructure
She: So we’re using their oil. You can see that’s not a good way to go about things. He was supportive of maintaining domestic drilling for the limited quantity we’ll need in the future. I partially concur with him. We’re still going to rely on air travel. We both think we should be moving towards greener solutions, turbine fields and hydro
For afters
Eva: We touched on anti-Muslim sentiment, though we didn’t call it that. He seemed worried by extremism coming here – he did mention that a many individuals in the Arab world were extremist, which I didn’t think fair. I think it’s discriminatory to form opinions based on faith
He: I hail from the eastern part of London. I asked her if she’d been to Whitechapel, and she said it had been gentrified. Obviously, I would say that: full of yuppies. But when I go down that local market, I appear out of place. People stare at me because it’s become predominantly Islamic. She had a little look at me about that. I used the word “ghetto”. Eva’s got Polish-Jewish ancestry – she objects to the term, to her it implies deprivation. I said, “No, it’s an area that becomes theirs.” I agreed to use a different word – maybe community?
She: I believe that Muslim people are really overrepresented in the media as doing things wrong. It seems a little bit racist, or xenophobic
Conclusion
Steve: I think we parted on good terms. We had a hug at the train stop
Eva: We both said that we’d had a lovely time